Jpegli vs WebP: What’s the Difference Between These Formats?
In 2024, Google introduced Jpegli, an advanced JPEG encoding library, aiming to boost the efficiency of the decades-old JPEG format. This new tool is designed to improve image compression without compromising on quality. But how does Jpegli stack up against WebP, another popular image format that has been widely adopted for its superior compression capabilities?
In this article, we get into understanding the differences between Jpegli and WebP, exploring their use cases, strengths, and limitations.
Why Image Compression Matters
Did you know that images can account for over 60% of a webpage’s data size? Reducing image file sizes is crucial for improving website load times and user experience.
Slow-loading sites can lead to higher bounce rates, which negatively impacts SEO. Thus, the battle for efficient image formats is more critical than ever.
Must read: How to make EVS Notebook Image
What is Jpegli?
Jpegli is Google’s latest attempt to enhance the traditional JPEG format. It’s not a new image format but rather an encoder library that improves how JPEGs are compressed.
This library achieves up to 35% better compression compared to older JPEG codecs while retaining visual quality. It supports 10-bit per channel color depth, which reduces banding and improves gradient smoothness in images.
The primary goal of Jpegli is to provide a solution that web developers can easily adopt without changing their existing workflows.
This is because Jpegli maintains compatibility with the existing JPEG ecosystem, making it easier for websites and applications already using JPEGs to benefit from better compression and faster load times without any changes to file formats.
Also read: 10+ Best Websites For Copyright Free Images
What is WebP?
On the other hand, WebP is a modern image format developed by Google back in 2010. It’s known for its lossy and lossless compression, offering smaller file sizes than traditional JPEGs.
WebP supports advanced features such as transparent backgrounds (similar to PNG) and animations (like GIFs), making it versatile for various use cases.
WebP images can be up to 34% smaller than comparable JPEG files and 26% smaller than PNGs, making them ideal for the web.
Key Differences Between JPEGLI and WebP
| Feature | Jpegli | WebP |
|---|---|---|
| Type | JPEG encoder library | Image format |
| Compression | Lossy (improved JPEG compression) | Lossy and lossless |
| Color Depth | Up to 10 bits per channel | 8 bits per channel |
| Transparency | Not supported | Supported |
| Animation | Not supported | Supported |
| Compatibility | Fully backward compatible with JPEG | Supported across all major browsers |
Use Cases: When to Use Jpegli vs. WebP
Jpegli is best suited for situations where JPEG is the standard, and there’s a need to optimize image sizes without losing quality. For example:
- Photography websites that already use JPEG and want better compression.
- Web developers looking to improve page load times without converting their entire image library to a new format.
- Content management systems that rely on JPEG for compatibility reasons.
WebP, on the other hand, is ideal when:
- You need transparent backgrounds (like in PNG) for icons, logos, or overlays.
- You want animated images that are smaller than GIFs.
- You are building a website from scratch and have the flexibility to choose a more efficient format.
- You aim for the best balance between image quality and size, especially in modern web designs.
Also read: 10 Best Reverse Image Search Tool (Updated List)
Performance Comparison
Jpegli’s biggest advantage is that it brings enhanced compression to the familiar JPEG format, which is still widely used across the web.
It uses advanced algorithms from JPEG XL, borrowing features like XYB color space to optimize compression efficiency without losing compatibility with existing JPEG viewers.
Early tests show that Jpegli can reduce image sizes by up to 35% compared to traditional JPEGs while maintaining high visual quality.
WebP, by contrast, provides better compression across both lossy and lossless modes. For instance, WebP images used on websites can load faster due to smaller file sizes.
The format also enjoys broad support from modern web browsers, making it a robust choice for web use.
Browser and Platform Support
As of 2024, Jpegli is not yet universally supported by all browsers or image viewers, since it’s an encoding library rather than a standalone format. This means that while developers can benefit from using it behind the scenes, end users won’t need to worry about compatibility issues, as files remain standard JPEGs.
WebP enjoys broad support across all major browsers like Chrome, Firefox, Edge, and even Safari. This extensive compatibility makes WebP a go-to choice for web developers focused on optimizing their sites for speed.
Which One Should You Choose?
Choosing between Jpegli and WebP depends on your specific needs:
- If you want to optimize JPEGs without adopting a new format, Jpegli is your best bet. It offers superior compression while staying backward compatible with the widely used JPEG format.
- If you are looking for a versatile format that supports transparency and animations, go with WebP. It’s optimized for the modern web, providing excellent quality at a smaller size.
Future of Image Compression
With Google’s ongoing efforts, Jpegli could become a game-changer for those who are still heavily reliant on JPEGs. However, WebP continues to be a strong contender for general web use due to its versatility and efficiency.
The landscape of image compression is constantly evolving, with other formats like AVIF and JPEG XL also gaining traction. As technology advances, choosing the right format will increasingly depend on specific use cases rather than one-size-fits-all solutions.
Also read: Library Genesis (LibGen): What is it? How it works
Wrapping up!
Both Jpegli and WebP have their strengths. Jpegli excels in enhancing the performance of the existing JPEG ecosystem, while WebP offers modern capabilities like transparency and animation.
By understanding their differences, you can choose the format that best fits your needs, whether for web development, photography, or digital content.
By staying informed about the latest developments in image compression technologies, you can make more strategic decisions that benefit both user experience and SEO.
For further insights into these formats, you can explore detailed guides and benchmarks on sources like Beebom and Google’s Open Source blog.