Every flight on a commercial airline starts with a flight plan. Small modifications to each flight plan over time can result in significant cost reductions for the entire fleet. The best use of redispatch, correct flight plans, dynamic airborne replanning, and dynamic route optimization are just a few of the variables that affect total performance.
Also, Copenhagen Optimization offers airports cloud-based forecasting and optimization tools. The programme offers capabilities such as queue management, passenger and luggage forecasts, and traffic analysis that help customers plan and assess airport operations. The business also provides consulting services for hospitals and airports to improve operations.
All airlines utilizecomputerized flight planning systems, but using a high-end system effectively has a considerable influence on both profitability and the environment.
- An operational flight plan is necessary to make sure an aircraft complies with all operational requirements for a particular flight, to provide the flight crew with information to guarantee a safe flight, and to communicate with air traffic control (ATC).
- Although many flight plans are now calculated using computers, not all of these systems are the same. Choosing a more powerful system and utilizing all of its analytical and optimization capabilities has benefits. As carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions are closely correlated to fuel burn, with more than 20 pounds of CO2 emitted per U.S. gallon of fuel consumed, using the flight planning process to reduce fuel consumption not only saves money but also benefits the environment.
- An efficient flight plan can lower fuel expenses, time-based costs, over flight costs, and lost revenue from payload that can’t be carried by adjusting the route (i.e., ground track), altitudes, speeds, and amount of departure fuel. These changes are dependent on the performance of the aircraft, the weather, the permitted route and altitude structure, the timetable restrictions, and the operating restrictions.
- While calculations for flight plans are essential for safety and legal compliance, they also give airlines the chance to reduce costs by helping them choose the best route, altitudes, speeds, and fuel load for an aircraft.
The fact that optimization incorporates so many different components makes it difficult at times. In addition to correct physics (i.e., aircraft performance and weather), an optimum flight plan must take into account all applicable regulatory requirements. Even by the standards of contemporary optimization, this task is difficult due to the mathematical structure of these constraints and the magnitude of the total calculation.
The behavior is described by a number of nonlinear, noncontiguous equations, and the state of the aeroplane is dynamic. Therefore, for a single flight, tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of separate calculations are needed.
Calculating multiple routes or operating approaches for each flight, ranking these scenarios by total cost, selecting the scenario that best achieves the airline’s cost objectives, and providing summaries of the other scenarios for operational flexibility are all part of an optimal flight planning scenario for reducing fuel and emissions.
Although the system’s chosen scenario may be employed the majority of the time, dispatchers and operations managers in a control center for an airline may select a different scenario to achieve the airline’s operational objectives, such as routing of aircraft, crews, and passengers. A user-friendly display of the pertinent data is essential because they frequently make these judgments just before departure time.