Before creating a social media profile, any platform asks its potential users to agree with its terms and conditions; otherwise, it is impossible to sign a contract. These terms include user’s and network’s legal rights as well the company’s inside policy. For example, usually, by agreeing to these terms, the website receives legal rights to any content that is uploaded on the platform.
However, most of the users don’t read them before accepting, as they consider it a mere formality and a long boring text, so they have no idea what they agreed to. Generally, social media allows users to share visual content, such as photographs, digital artwork, and videos. Suppose you are a content creator of such a kind of a business that wishes to spread the word about their authorized work and reach out to larger audiences.
In that case, you can use the external assistance of SocialGreg, which allows you to gain attention to your social media profile and created work. This kind of content is considered creative work and is usually protected by copyright law. However, there is one issue, as most of the popular social media sites are accessible from around the globe, the network’s copyright policy needs to coordinate with different kinds of individual laws from other countries. Moreover, the issue with protecting authors’ moral rights arises due to their unconscious agreement with the terms mentioned above.
Copyright law may seem self-explanatory and like a well-defined term meaning where someone, which creates any kind of creative or intellectual work, such as a book, photo, or any type of art, is protected by the copyright law as an owner or their work. Copyright protects contents’ authors automatically without any kind of formal procedures, and every country has its regulations regarding ownership rights. However, the European Union has established its copyright policy above the member states’ national legislative rules.
To understand how the law works, one needs to take into consideration the European Union’s purpose and nature. One of the organization’s three primary goals is Europe’s economic and political integration. Thus, member countries obey several rules and laws established by the EU as they become somewhat similar. Moreover, these laws dominate members’ national ones.
Overview Of The EU’s Copyright Law
The European Union claims to have the ability to protect human rights and liberty. Rights become prominent in societies with different interests. However, individual member states all have different definitions of “human rights,” and standardization of laws faces more challenges as preferences and positions differ across nations. To consider all certain rights that all citizens in all EU countries share, the organization allows each member country to raise a question about the specific and all other country constitutions will be identical to it.
Accordingly, there are a wide variety of EU directives for copyright protection. They state that the right to spread work is its author’s right, and member states must commit and give the author the right to suppress unauthorized proliferation and stealth of their content. However, on social media, the content owner is questionable as, according to EU directives, if work is legally received or purchased, or the author gives the right to other mediums to share their work, it can be distributed.
This rule covers technological developments as well; the rightsholder is someone who created the work, purchased it, or otherwise legally got the ownership, thus has the right to spread it by any means, but most frequently, it is done on social media.
Overview Of The US’s Copyright Law
The United States has a similar regulation regarding copyright – work can be distributed under the protection of the law. However, this only refers to the published work authorized by US citizens and unpublished work created by authors of any nationality. Thus, published content created by international organizations, corporations, and residents of other countries remains unprotected. The law also protects authors who are citizens of allied states.
In sum, even if the copyright gives the author absolute right to their work, there are several occasions where this protection has no use, providing other parties with the right to use the copyrighted work. One of them is creative commons.
For some reason, some authors do not wish to have full authority over their content and transfer some rights to the public they share their work with. Creative Commons are six types of licenses that provide six sets of different rights to rights holders, for example, commercial distribution. They also allow authors to publish work without any right attached to it, which can be recognized as work within the public ownership. However, Creative Commons licenses are not able to return rights of ownership to the authors who already refused them earlier.